See all articles

Reform Has a Silver Lining

What the end of medical underwriting means for health insurers.

In just a few years, we will look back on this time, shake our heads and try to remember why we were okay with the health-insurance system we had. Fifty million uninsured. People with gold-plated insurance plans that covered multiple courses of fertility drugs and in-vitro fertilizations costing hundreds of thousands of dollars while their next door neighbor couldn't get insurance because they were born with asthma? Insurance companies actually turning away 20-35 percent of applicants based on a medical questionnaire?

I believe we have crossed the tipping point in the conversation about healthcare and health insurance, and there is no turning back. I am not sure where this will lead, or exactly what all the different reforms will look like, or even how we are going to pay for it. But one thing seems absolutely clear to me. Medical underwriting is going away.

If you work for a health-insurance company, or managed-care organization and are responsible for marketing, you had better start planning for a world where there is no medical underwriting. This will be the first outpost to fall in the re-engineering of the American healthcare system simply because it is the hardest practice to defend and has come to symbolize what's wrong with the private health-insurance system.

Those calling for sweeping changes will win the battle to eliminate medical underwriting, and with it the concepts of pre-existing conditions and waiting periods will fall as well. AHIP and the Blue Cross Association have already offered to drop these aspects of health insurance if the Feds mandate that all Americans must have health insurance. They reserve the right to rate based on age, sex and location.

If these two organizations, both extremely conservative in their outlook and pace of change, can read the writing on the wall and see that defending medical underwriting is a losing battle, then you know something significant is happening.

A good marketer isn't afraid of the government getting into their business.

Some pundits believe that this is the end of private health insurance, but I believe this is actually a tremendous opportunity to bring a new wave of marketing to health insurance. As long as medical underwriting was used as the basis for individual sales, marketing can target everyone and let the medical questionnaire sort out your target customers.

But a bold new world without medical underwriting doesn't mean you can't do everything in your power to attract young, healthy customers. It just means you have to find different ways of doing it. You won't be able to eliminate the unhealthy. You will have to find ways to attract and close your target customers, and they may not be who you think they are now.

Dig into your data and talk with your customer service folks and your medical directors. Figure out who your target customers really are. Then figure out what messages appeal to them, how they evaluate you and your competitors, and how they are making decisions. Who are they listening to for advice?

With the medical questionnaire gone, you can be proactive, develop profiles of your target customers, and create and test messaging and approaches to appeal to them. Where are they? What do they value? What do they want from health insurance? You know—real strategic marketing.

The government supplies clean, cold water for free in pretty much every building in America, but that didn't stop a host of companies from figuring out how to market one-dollar bottles of water in machines that sometimes stand right next to drinking fountains. A good marketer isn't afraid of the government getting into their business.

Will you or your competitors be faster to adapt to the new order of things?

view details

Tom Riley, Principal

Tom Riley is the Practice Lead for closerlook's health-insurance and health-information technology practices, and oversees new business development and client services. He identifies new service and market opportunities and builds partnerships that expand closerlook's reach within the healthcare industry.

Tom has over 20 years of experience in healthcare, with specific expertise in
e-business, sales and marketing, information technology and mergers and acquisitions. Prior to joining closerlook, Tom spent over 17 years with Health Care Service Corporation, the parent company of BlueCross BlueShield of Illinois, Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico. As the Corporate Vice President of the company's eSolutions group, he was responsible for the company's strategies for e-business, health-information technology and information technology and investment portfolio. Tom has also served on the board of directors of Availity LLC.

Get in touch with Tom

Leave a comment

Comments (22)

CEO

Jul 30, 3:56 PM
www.infinitehealthcarellc.com

Company was created to give a different outlook on the Healthcare Reform with a key focus on stabalizing insurance, creating a healthier workforce and linking key players with the services needed for a much smoother transition.

wesley blanch finklea

Jul 23, 7:02 AM

i need aforable health ins. i need aforable dentest ins.i live in marion south carolina we are the hightest unemplored in the world

alvin larock

Jul 20, 11:20 AM

i am 62 years of age on ssd after some serious medical issues insuarance cancled several thousand of dollars in debt due to my wifes dying father we have to many assets to recive welfare assistance we have a morgage on our home that we had to move out of due to health selling will not help out we signed father in laws home where we live over to son but now have to wait again to get help have to wait 2 years for madicare went from a thousdand a week to a thousand a month pills for the month or food yet some who are young and can work dont and get everything dont think i can afford the plan as is so where does this leave some one like me is there a plan B

Abdul Rahem

Jul 9, 6:01 PM

Thanks for a very positive out look on the what's about to happen to the health care system. I am a licensed insurance producer and feel that things are going to get vry exciting for profesionals like me. Am right or wrong to feel so optimistic? What do you think the major insurance companies will do to lessen the opportunities that I think are coming down the pike? Regards, Abdul

dorothy raczkowski

Jun 7, 8:49 AM

As a retiree I am interested in LTC. What is "CLASS"? How does this apply to me? Thank You.

Sam Otrr

Jun 7, 8:05 AM

Where is the health care we were promised? Folks Like me who can't get insurance and children with preexisting conditions are already supposed to be able to get health care through the new law but where is it? No one I talk to knows a damn thing about it. For the health care law to be successful people have to start using it. The right wingers are trying to starve the program out by simply not making accessible.

Naram

Apr 16, 8:12 AM

Now we need more Primary care Physicians!!! These are our suggestions. Statistics show many US citizens educated in off shore medical schools with all the required certifications are waiting to get into residency programs in the US. (They were side stepped by foreign citizens). Medical residency programs start in June. Typically each residency program takes 6 to 8 residents into their programs. Why not add one more resident (US Citizen) to each one of those already existing medical residency programs. In 3 years we will have plenty of US Doctors to take care of the whole population. Secondary benefits will be the jobs created by these doctors.

Warren Hunter

Apr 8, 10:41 AM
www.dmwdirect.com

I think we are entering a brave new world where marketing to those we belieive to be the best risk is the way carriers should be spending their money. Everyone and anyone who wants insurance will find their way to the doors of those they want to cover them -- so it only makes sense to spend advertising and marketing dollars trying to attract those that we believe to be the best risk -- to offset those we know will not be. It is an unfortunate thing that "health care reform" became "health INSUANCE reform" and that the onus for fixing the problem was placed on the insuranace industry. We have sky high costs in the delivery system as well as the pharma industry. I didn't see any legislation to rein in those costs -- and that's what it will really take to fix the health care system in this country.

HARRY FUTRELL

Mar 26, 6:11 AM

GOOD FOR ME AND THE COUNTRY.I KNOW I TRYED TO GET INSURANCE AN I GOT SOME GOOD DEALS I THOUGHT. BUT AFTER THEY FOUND I LIVE IN MICHIGAN FORGET IT .WHY DOES IT COST SO MUCH IN MICHIGAN THEN OTHER STATES. THEN YOU GOT PEOPLE WANTING TO KILL THE BILL IN THIS STATE.ALL I CAN SAY IS IF YOU ARE A REPUBLICAN THATS OK BUT WHEN IT COMES TO HEALTH CARE REFORM YOU NEED TO GET SMART. THE INSURANCE PEOPLE LOVE THE REPUBLICANS AN YOU KNOW ALL OF THEM GOT SOMETHING FOR THERE VOTE AN I HATE TO SAY THIS BUT A .HAND FULL OF DEMOCRATES GOT SOMETHING FOR THERE NO VOTE.YOU CAN SEE NOW WHO CARE ABOUT THE HARD WORKING MIDDLE CLASS. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK PRESIDENT OBAMA AND THE TRUE DEMOCRATES WE KNOW WHO YOU ARE NOW

Paul Puopolo

Mar 19, 3:41 PM

If insurance will need to be available to everyone and underwriting goes away, then there needs to be mechanism that provides the information and plans to the population. What are the thoughts on health exchanges? If these are needed and pre-existing conditions go away, some type of community rating must occur (ie. age, gender, and location) to set the price. Essentially, older people who may live in a certain areas will pay more on their premiums. Does the government now need to subsidize the cost for certain income levels? This is now not a marketing question to young and healthy people but a process for risk selection. Marketing to individuals on the value of networks, care mgt, admin efficiency is great but doesn't allow any insight into the health factors that may drive up the "risk burden". You won't be able to control for attracting healthy or less healthy populations. Mandatory insurance will be required and rates monitored much like CMS does today for the Medicare population.

Stephen

Mar 18, 1:51 PM
www.basicmarketingideas.com

"The government supplies clean, cold water for free..." Does that mean I can stop paying taxes and my monthly water bill?

Lucky

Feb 24, 1:23 PM

We as tax payers, through our tax system pay our elected officials wages. We also pay for their benefits or at least provide a means for them to get those benefits at little to no cost to them.On the other hand they are spending hard paid tax dollars to support other countries, give aid, fight others wars all while saying to hell with the ones that are making the wheels of government turn!Its as plain as the nose on your face that we as tax payers, keep everything running.If you are an american, work and pay taxes and become ill then you should as our elected officials have the right to healthcare at no charge! After all,if you pay tax and become unable to work it is to the countries benefit to try and get you back to productivity again,

jeanie

Feb 15, 5:44 PM

We need health care reform...why are we not hearing a thing about it...it can't die..help keep the fight going...what is wrong???

Moses Giddings

Feb 15, 11:16 AM

I just can not understand the argument of government involvement in the health of its citizens when government pays bills for people who can not afford health insurance. What saddens me is those who jump in the street protesting against the health reform which is in their very interest: I do have coverage, but there are too many who do not. Even those of us that have, have multiple disadvantages. I wish the so-called conservatives could be little humane in allowing this bill to pass. I wish Sarah Palin and others knew what it feels like being without health insurance. I am a conservative, but if being conservative now means being careless about the wellbeings of others, then I am having a second thought - I may go for an independent citizen.

A. Hardwick

Jan 13, 7:03 AM

Health care needs to be available to everyone who needs it. A Government Medicaid buy-in for any American who wants it should be available, and if this is eliminated from the healthcare reform bill the bill will be nothing, we will have no reform at all. People who do not belong to a group plan cannot afford the premiums of private insurance companies.

madelyne

Jan 8, 9:16 PM

If a law is made stating all healthcare facilities need to use EMR by 2014, does that mean the federal government will assist hospitals, if unable to afford, to make this occur?

Erik

Jan 1, 11:32 PM

I'm not one of those people who know alot about politics, and I couldn't tell you what is unconstitutional or not; but Im a man with a family to support, and a man that will loose his job due to high taxes and this new reform plan, or what ever our great minds in the oval office call this thing. I agree with the other comment about this is the land of the free and the land of opportunity, and it's a go big or go home world out there and only the strong survive, and we cannot continue to be as strong as our weakest link. We need to be strong as a whole that is the only way this economy will get better and people can go back to chaseing there dreams and not have to worry about is this my last day at work!!! Thank you. Erik.

Martha

Dec 29, 1:11 PM

NO GOVT RUN HEALTH CARE. Over 2,000 pages of regulations are TOO OPEN ENDED! Public Option is socialism; Government has no right to require everyone to have Health Insurance. This document that can not be abolished or amended is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. This bill alone will cost taxpayers MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN UNWRITTEN TAXES. If passed it must go to the Supreme Court for a constitutionality test AND NEEDS TO GO TO THE PEOPLE FOR THEIR VOTE. THIS COUNTRY IS FOUNDED ON FREEDOM AND "WE ARE THE LAND OF THE FREE', WE NEED TO KEEP IT THAT WAY. NOT THE LAND OF THE GOVERNMENT!!!! Martha M. Los Angeles, California

Chas Gilmore

Dec 23, 0:47 AM

Our government has no business being in the face of business becuase it does nothing well. Look at any goverment managed program as reference. This bill is about political control and has numerous unconstitutional provisions. Those who will feel the pain will be those who can least afford it...as usual. The "feel good" policies of the left have never succeeded...not once. What about the 25 million who still will not have healthcare? What about the elderly who will have their medicade cut. What about the rising taxes on a population already stretched to the limit. Unemployment will rise, healthcare quality will fall and in November many democrats will be without seats in congress and the senate. And Obama...well he will blame Bush and ignore the fact that the democrats have been incharge since 2006. I pray for the success of our President and those elected to office but I am extremely disappointed in both.

jami mullikin

Sep 20, 7:21 PM
http://www.hillmullikin.com/blog

As a marketer as well as someone totally frustrated with our health care system, I enjoyed your thoughts. I would hope that this would also drive costs down by creating competition, do away with the bait and switch that we always get when shopping our group plan each year, provide respectable customer service and place a value on customer retention. My family's BCBS premium is $1,200 per month for the high deductible policy and that does not include the optional HSA contribution. It is infuriating.

DaveO

Jun 15, 3:46 PM
http://www.closerlook.com

The president's speech on healthcare reform pretty much validated everything you say here, Tom. His plan would ban the denial of insurance coverage for pre-existing conditions. "The days of cherry-picking are over." It's time for health plans to begin planning for this new world...

Dave Mahder

Jun 8, 2:20 PM

Tom great to see the finished product!! Dave